HUD Grant Rules: Is NYC Homeless Funding at Risk?

HUD grants controversy in NYC risking homeless funding, with political conflict and concern for Las Vegas real estate
  • Over 11,000 NYC residents could lose housing aid connected to HUD grants.
  • HUD’s change on DEI and sanctuary city conditions caused legal disputes in at least 4 states.
  • Federal court approved putting into action executive orders limiting funding tied to DEI.
  • Dropping Housing First guidelines may increase homelessness and make vulnerable residents less stable.
  • Las Vegas real estate may experience effects as HUD reconsiders funding across major cities.

HUD Grant Rules: Is NYC Homeless Funding at Risk?

Federal housing policy is again central to national discussion, putting important programs like the Continuum of Care at risk. When HUD connected federal funding to controversial political criteria, the reaction was immediate, leading to legal fights and policy reversals. This article goes into detail about the consequences for HUD grants, NYC homelessness services, and the wider effects for federal housing funding in cities like Las Vegas and other places.

person receiving housing assistance at home

What Is the HUD Continuum of Care Program?

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Continuum of Care (CoC) program is a key part of federal housing funding aimed at lessening homelessness. The program backs a network of nonprofit groups, city partners, and housing advocates by providing competitive grants to give shelter, rental aid, and lasting solutions for unhoused individuals and families.

In cities like New York City, where the cost of living is high and the shelter system is always overwhelmed, HUD’s CoC dollars are truly vital. Specifically, the funding covers

  • Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH): Long-term housing with important support services like mental health care.
  • Rapid Rehousing Programs: Short-term rental help and services intended to quickly move people out of homelessness.
  • Transitional Housing: Temporary housing choices along with job training or substance use treatment.
  • Rental Subsidies: Payments directly to landlords for formerly homeless individuals living in private market units.

For NYC alone, HUD CoC funding helps keep housing steady for over 11,000 people—many of whom are survivors of domestic violence, veterans, chronically homeless individuals, or those recovering from substance abuse. When this funding is stopped or put in danger, the system weakens, and those most at risk are often the first to feel it.

worried nonprofit workers in office setting

Sudden Policy Shifts Leave Nonprofits Scrambling

In March 2024, HUD surprised nonprofit housing providers with sudden legal additions to federal grant agreements. These new clauses—given without advance notice—required grantees to state they do not take part in efforts that support

  • “Gender ideology”
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives
  • Sanctuary city policies that support undocumented immigrants

These politically motivated rules made for disorder within a day. Many nonprofit directors worried that refusing to sign would mean losing needed funds; others were concerned about going against current non-discrimination goals and state laws. The following day, HUD changed direction because of great media pressure and possible legal examination.

Even with this reversal, the event showed how at risk critical homelessness funding is to partisan control. It also made clear strong disagreements between federal housing officials and nonprofit partners responsible for providing services in communities.

Further complicating things: as of April 2024, no new grant agreements have been finalized. Nonprofits are working in uncertainty, unsure if another version of politically charged conditions might come up again or if payments will be delayed once more.

courtroom with judge and legal documents

The strain between federal requirements and local principles is getting worse, especially as it relates to DEI. A March 2024 federal appeals court ruling removed a prior order that had stopped putting into effect executive orders wanting to limit federal support for groups connected to DEI values.

This allowed HUD—and other federal agencies—to legally withhold or set conditions on funding based on a recipient’s DEI involvement. While the complete consequences are still not known, the ruling encourages political figures wanting to change or remove DEI from government-supported programs.

Already, several states have pushed back. Housing advocacy groups in Massachusetts, Idaho, Texas, and Ohio have started lawsuits against HUD, the White House Office of Management and Budget, and related federal groups. These suits claim that using federal housing dollars to punish DEI connection is

  • Unconstitutional and unfair
  • A violation of current civil rights laws
  • A risky starting point for policy-driven funding methods

If these lawsuits are successful, they could bring back protections for groups that support DEI, but a long legal fight is ahead. In the meantime, HUD grant recipients are left to deal with a risky funding situation full of uncertainty.

person moving into new apartment

Why the Housing First Model Matters

A separate, but equally serious, change involves moving away from Housing First—a way of thinking and method supporting easy entry into stable housing as a needed step for recovery.

For over ten years, HUD strongly suggested Housing First principles because much proof showed it worked well. Key advantages include

  • Immediate stabilization: Giving someone a home first greatly improves their chances of seeking work, health care, or treatment programs.
  • Reduction in emergency service use: Individuals in stable housing need fewer hospital visits, police actions, and shelter nights.
  • Increased program compliance: Stable housing makes it simpler for service providers to keep regular contact with clients.

Now, HUD no longer requires grant recipients to use Housing First. Critics of this change say that it brings back older models that put importance on sobriety, work participation, or treatment compliance before housing—often impossible obstacles for the unhoused.

The effect at the nonprofit level could be serious

  • Programs may lose eligibility if they cannot quickly change to new compliance rules.
  • Clients may become confused or feel separated by changes in program needs.
  • Service gaps could occur as groups reconsider how they work under conflicting federal direction.

Essentially, stepping away from Housing First risks undoing years of gains based on research in lessening chronic homelessness.

nyc apartment building exterior

The Real-World Impact in NYC

The bureaucratic back-and-forth has real and immediate results in New York City, where homelessness is a long-lasting and growing crisis. Among the groups at risk

  • Urban Pathways: Working with a $271,000 HUD grant, they house homeless adults in Midtown—a place where even a one-month gap in rent promises eviction.
  • New Destiny Housing: Focused on survivors of domestic violence, the group points out that 100% of its HUD funding goes toward rent help. Any stop isn’t just an accounting issue—it’s homes lost.
  • 26 nonprofit programs: Have HUD contracts that were either ended or getting close to ending by early spring 2024. Without clarity or finalized agreements, their work stops, even as shelter need rises.

NYC’s shelter system, already working beyond capacity, relies on HUD grants to move individuals into permanent housing—making beds available for the newly homeless. Cuts or pauses in this flow back up the whole system, affecting emergency shelters, mental health teams, and housing court cases.

The Scope of the Crisis in NYC

Homelessness in NYC has reached crisis levels. According to recent data, more than 140,000 individuals are now experiencing housing instability, whether sleeping in shelters, on streets, or staying with others temporarily (Gothamist, 2024).

What’s especially worrying is that HUD’s Continuum of Care funding isn’t just a small part of support—it’s a foundation. If these dollars disappear or are delayed

  • Eviction prevention programs lose power.
  • Formerly stable clients may go back into homelessness.
  • Partnerships with city agencies break down, wasting important city resources.

Short breaks in funding can erase months of progress. For advocates, the lesson is clear: being able to predict and having neutrality in federal housing grants are essential when fighting long-term homelessness.

street scene in las vegas with tents

Could Las Vegas Be Next?

While NYC is the current center of attention, cities like Las Vegas must also get ready. With its growing population, housing instability has become a local worry. In the past, Las Vegas has depended greatly on HUD Continuum of Care funds for

  • Homeless encampment outreach
  • Transitional housing buildings
  • Rapid rehousing financial help
  • Legal aid for evictions or landlord disagreements

If HUD makes rule changes wider, Nevada nonprofits may soon face the same problem: follow questionable political limits or give up important funding.

Las Vegas may be especially at risk because of

  • Less legal strength compared to NYC or Los Angeles
  • Smaller nonprofit groups, with fewer financial reserves
  • Fast-rising housing costs, leaving fewer affordable units available as a way out

This city stands as a sign: if HUD puts in place more changes without challenge, housing nonprofits across the Sun Belt could be stretched too far.

las vegas residential neighborhood aerial view

Why the Vegas Real Estate Community Should Pay Attention

Housing nonprofits, city planners, and investors may live in different areas—but their futures are connected. According to experienced realtor Steve Hawks, housing security isn’t a charity matter—it’s a market steadiness matter.

Policy-driven HUD funding cuts could cause

  • Increased displacement: Tenants with weak support lose homes, raising area vacancy and turnover rates.
  • Neighborhood destabilization: Loss of dependable tenants, more visible homelessness, and lowered trust in public groups.
  • Eroding property values: A rise in visible homelessness often leads to community disinvestment.
  • Higher city risk: Governments may be forced to increase spending without equal federal contributions.

For investors and property owners, losing the support that HUD grants give indirectly affects cap rates, ROI, and local taxation. Housing doesn’t exist alone—it’s connected to mental health, workforce involvement, school results, and even starting businesses.

new affordable housing development

Housing Stability and Responsible Investment

Affordable housing isn’t bad for business. In fact, it’s needed for a successful real estate system. Neighborhoods that give a range of housing choices generally

  • Show slower drops during market downturns
  • Attract long-term tenants and homeowners
  • Get more consistent taxpayer funding for infrastructure

Real estate investors have a part to play in protecting steadiness

  • Support open zoning and ADU growth to widen housing stock
  • Partner with nonprofits to give housing units through public-private models
  • Join housing policy discussions making sure there is balance between profit and public need

By connecting market rewards with social progress, developers and investors can make sure their projects add to a successful future—rather than a broken one.

What Happens Next?

As of mid-2024, HUD says it will soon give revised grant agreements—but few details have come out. Lawyers, nonprofits, and city officials are getting ready for another round of political conditions or more confusion. Courts continue to hear arguments related to if it is legal to set conditions on federal grants based on political beliefs, especially as they relate to DEI and immigration.

NYC may set the legal direction, but Las Vegas and other cities would do well to get ready. That includes

  • Mapping how much groups depend on HUD CoC funding
  • Building local emergency funds to protect against federal disruptions
  • Speaking out through city and state ways to fight politicized cuts

No one wants needed housing resources to become political issues. But for now, the fight over HUD grants, NYC homelessness policy, and federal housing funding is just getting more intense. Readiness, openness, and cooperation across different areas will be key to getting through what’s ahead.

Citations